The British Petroleum complex in eastern Algeria. Photo by the Associated Foreign Press.
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Al-Qaeda In The Islamic Maghreb Rises To Fame
Last Wednesday, in perhaps the first significant and violent reaction to French military strikes on Islamic militants in Mali, the world was shocked to learn of a hostage crisis that ended in bloodshed. Dozens of hostages and militants were killed at a BP complex in eastern Algeria in one of the clearest examples of festering terrorist activity in the northwest African region. Violence perpetuated by the al-Qaeda offshoot in Mali and its Algerian counterpart in recent weeks has brought new urgency to addressing the growing extremism in the region and has illuminated the extent to which these groups are supported from abroad.
Friday, January 18, 2013
You Can Expect International Outcry for Bolivia's Apparent Amorality
In one of the most disturbing pieces of news I have read in recent months (yes, months), a video surfaced this week of an apparent rape on the Bolivian Parliament floor. Lawmaker Domingo Alcibia Rivera is seen in the video - which is from a security camera in the room - engaging in intercourse with a fellow female lawmaker who was drunk, having passed out after a holiday party. This took place on December 20th, almost four weeks ago, which brings up the even more disturbing aspect of the story: the Bolivian government attempted to cover it up.
As Jezebel reports, the security guards who were on shift that night have been dismissed; Mr. Rivera has disappeared from the political world, and the victim has been transferred to another Parliamentary position. Who was in charge of making these decisions is unclear, but the fact that such an atrocity would be covered up by those elected by the people to govern, is frightening. Bolivian President Evo Morales' statement yesterday condemning the coverup was at best half-hearted - he recommended that all the officials involved be placed on "indefinite suspension", which hardly seems sufficient given the circumstances.
This case highlights a fact that is often overlooked when examining global issues: studies show that nearly half of all Latin American women face some sort of domestic violence or sexual assault. On a continent where there are widespread drug problems, some of the most violent gangs on earth, and frequent government disagreements, such a serious problem may sometimes be ignored. It shouldn't be, however; with such intense focus on sexual assault here in America, we should take the time to focus on the problem in other places as well.
Setting all of this aside however, one thing is for certain: in the coming weeks we will likely be seeing forthcoming scrutiny from all over the world directed towards the abhorrent malfeasance of Bolivian politicians. In this case, it is perfectly warranted.
As Jezebel reports, the security guards who were on shift that night have been dismissed; Mr. Rivera has disappeared from the political world, and the victim has been transferred to another Parliamentary position. Who was in charge of making these decisions is unclear, but the fact that such an atrocity would be covered up by those elected by the people to govern, is frightening. Bolivian President Evo Morales' statement yesterday condemning the coverup was at best half-hearted - he recommended that all the officials involved be placed on "indefinite suspension", which hardly seems sufficient given the circumstances.
This case highlights a fact that is often overlooked when examining global issues: studies show that nearly half of all Latin American women face some sort of domestic violence or sexual assault. On a continent where there are widespread drug problems, some of the most violent gangs on earth, and frequent government disagreements, such a serious problem may sometimes be ignored. It shouldn't be, however; with such intense focus on sexual assault here in America, we should take the time to focus on the problem in other places as well.
Setting all of this aside however, one thing is for certain: in the coming weeks we will likely be seeing forthcoming scrutiny from all over the world directed towards the abhorrent malfeasance of Bolivian politicians. In this case, it is perfectly warranted.
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
France Launches Attacks in Mali, US Watches from the Sidelines
On
January 11, French forces began airstrikes throughout Northern Mali in
preparation for the beginning of the arrival of a regional force of about 3,300
troops as early as next week. I’ve previously written
about the ongoing conflict in the country, where in December a Malian tourism
official had reported that nearly all of the remaining mausoleums in Timbuktu
had been razed. While the loss of culture is devastating, even worse is the
growing human cost to the citizens of Mali and the region: the UN Refugee
Agency reports that
144,500 Malian refugees have been registered in neighboring countries and 228,918
people have been internally displaced. The actual numbers are likely much
higher due to the difficulty of recording these situations amidst such chaos.
The
UN approved international mission came sooner than expected by Security Council
resolution 2085 due to the Islamist rebel forces’ advance on southern Mali,
which the government in Bamako still maintains a shaky hold over. The town of
Konna, only 600 km from the capital, was captured by Islamists on January 10
and was the action that prompted the French Operation Serval. If the Islamists
had been allowed to reach the Sévaré military airport, international and
regional efforts to retake Mali would have been severely hindered if not
impossible according to international sources.
While
the US has expressed support for the French and African efforts, CIA Director
Leon Panetta has reaffirmed that America will commit not ground troops to the
conflict. However, the US will almost certainly provide logistical support up
to supplying planes for the French and African forces. Although it is not a
country often on the top tier of foreign policy concerns (many charge the US
with ignoring the extremist elements coming to the Malian fore), an Ansar Dine controlled
Mali would still be severely detrimental to efforts to curb radical Islamism in
the region and could have dire implications for other North African countries
fighting their own internal battles with extremists. Morocco, Algeria, and a
still fragile Libya stand to lose the most if Ansar Dine is able to infringe
further south or even just maintain its foothold in the north and should
provide their own support to the West African mission.
Furthermore,
West African and French troops alone could create more unrest due to France’s
colonial legacy in Africa and the West and North African differences in
language and religion. Including Moroccan and Algerian forces would at least
dilute charges that the conflict is one of Christian vs. Muslim. As noted
by Vicki Huddleston in a recent op-ed for the New York Times, Algeria has
already served as a mediator in previous negotiations between the Malian
government and Tuareg rebels. Since the Tuareg nationalists have been largely
sidelined by the Islamist group Ansar Dine, they could prove a vital ally to
fight against the group in the north while international forces push against
its encroachment in the south.
With
observers already worried that this could become “France’s Afghanistan,”
regional partners as well as the United States cannot act quickly enough to
provide support. Though the southern government is far from perfect, Ansar Dine
has shown such Taliban-esque qualities in the past few months ranging from
destruction of priceless tombs to gross violations of human rights that its
continued control over the north would be a humanitarian disaster.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Venezuela's Spectral Inauguration
Today, in Caracas, tens of thousands of Venezuelan citizens will gather to celebrate the swearing in and, consequently, the beginning of a new six-year presidential term for their country. What is different about today, however, is that the president, Hugo Chavez, will not be there; instead, he is fighting for his life in a Cuban hospital in Havana. In one of the most interesting constitutional debates in decades for this populist Latin American nation, the decision to allow Mr. Chavez to rule in absentia will be widely contested for weeks to come, with the repercussions potentially being quite catastrophic.
Mr. Chavez, who first won the presidency in 1999 and has held the position since, has been battling cancer for several years now. After four serious operations, the first occurring sometime in 2011, Mr. Chavez continues to struggle to return to a level of health necessary to rule a country with somewhat burgeoning strategic relevance in an important developing region of the world. There are myriad issues to address: minuscule oil production in recent years, a growing food shortage, and the need for stronger diplomatic ties with much of the Western world, most notably the United States. Mr. Chavez, who has long been a populist (ruling on the slogan "I am the people") has alienated himself and his country in the eyes of the United States, constantly drawing ire by supporting Iran, China, and many other nations the U.S. has questionable ties to.
With much to focus on in the coming months, the decision to allow Mr. Chavez to continue ruling from a hospital bed over a thousand miles away from Venezuela's capital is at best a parlous one. The Supreme Court, which is largely controlled by Chavez supporters (known as "Chavistas") ruled late last night that not only can the swearing in of the president be postponed to a later date, but that there is no time limit on when that date is. Until then, Mr. Chavez will govern through his Vice President, Nicolas Maduro, who has already begun talking to U.S. officials and others in an effort to exude authority.
Today, however, is a day of celebration and honor for many of Venezuela's 30 million citizens. As a sign of respect to Mr. Chavez, supporters are flocking to Caracas with sashes, typically worn by the President as he is sworn in. The people will continue to pray for Mr. Chavez as he fights a lung infection, his latest malaise, and the United States is likely joining in with optimism and hope that he makes a full recovery soon and heads back to rule his country for the next six years.
Mr. Chavez, who first won the presidency in 1999 and has held the position since, has been battling cancer for several years now. After four serious operations, the first occurring sometime in 2011, Mr. Chavez continues to struggle to return to a level of health necessary to rule a country with somewhat burgeoning strategic relevance in an important developing region of the world. There are myriad issues to address: minuscule oil production in recent years, a growing food shortage, and the need for stronger diplomatic ties with much of the Western world, most notably the United States. Mr. Chavez, who has long been a populist (ruling on the slogan "I am the people") has alienated himself and his country in the eyes of the United States, constantly drawing ire by supporting Iran, China, and many other nations the U.S. has questionable ties to.
With much to focus on in the coming months, the decision to allow Mr. Chavez to continue ruling from a hospital bed over a thousand miles away from Venezuela's capital is at best a parlous one. The Supreme Court, which is largely controlled by Chavez supporters (known as "Chavistas") ruled late last night that not only can the swearing in of the president be postponed to a later date, but that there is no time limit on when that date is. Until then, Mr. Chavez will govern through his Vice President, Nicolas Maduro, who has already begun talking to U.S. officials and others in an effort to exude authority.
Venezuela may not be out of the dark yet, however. Last September, the Council on Foreign Relations released a contingency plan highlighting some of the possible outcomes of either Mr. Chavez not being re-elected, or becoming to ill to rule or even dying. In the event of Chavez dying or withdrawing from the presidency for health reasons, the contingency plan predicts that with the onset of a new election with new candidates, splinters in the Chavista movement could incite mass violence and a state of emergency throughout the entire country. Bordering Colombia as well as Brazil, violence in Venezuela could become contagious, spreading quickly and causing a serious predicament in Latin America as the rest of the world struggles to quell not only rebel groups taking advantage of the situation, such as Colombia's FARC, but also overzealous military cleansing, like what happened in Argentina during the "Dirty War" of the 1970s.
Today, however, is a day of celebration and honor for many of Venezuela's 30 million citizens. As a sign of respect to Mr. Chavez, supporters are flocking to Caracas with sashes, typically worn by the President as he is sworn in. The people will continue to pray for Mr. Chavez as he fights a lung infection, his latest malaise, and the United States is likely joining in with optimism and hope that he makes a full recovery soon and heads back to rule his country for the next six years.
Monday, January 7, 2013
Chaotic Environments Shaping the Next Generations
Children in Gaza during the 2008/2009 Operation Cast Lead. (Photo by Al Jazeera)
In South Sudan, United Nations personnel persuade hundreds of children and teenagers to relinquish their guns in exchange for their reintegration into society. In Mali, children along with their families flee their homes in the northern region for safety from militias. In Gaza, prolonged instability and armed exchanges between militants and Israeli forces has resulted in PTSD in a majority of the strip's one million children. And just north in war-stricken Syria, thousands of Syrians flee their homes in the midst of bloodshed that has killed more than 60,000 people. International aid organizations like Save the Children--perpetually understaffed and underfunded--scramble to provide adequate resources to thousands of refugees living in camps in Iraq, Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan.
These are only a few examples of children engulfed in crisis situations that can have a drastic impact on a child's formation of intelligence, personality and social behavior. While children anywhere could be victim to any number of threats to their development and security, there are critical differences between a massacre of 20 children in a Connecticut elementary school and a flood in Pakistan or life in a refugee camp in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in how crises affect children. In the former situation, resources and personnel are readily accessible and available. There are local, state and federal governments that have the capacity to provide this aid, as well as the capacity to pass legislation that could diminish the chances of something like this happening again. Children can receive counseling and support from a grieving community that will foster their healthy, post-trauma development. At the other end of the spectrum, children and adolescents in poor, unstable and war torn countries face a different set of challenges and opportunities. The governments may be corrupt, illegitimate or nonexistent, unable or unwilling to provide adequate emergency supplies to those displaced and affected by crises. The child's community becomes defined by the shared experiences of squalor, homelessness, malnutrition and witness to violence, instead of by its capacity to nurture the afflicted and itself back to health. Political instability invites outside pressures that recruit children to battle. Even their own government might consider recruiting child soldiers. Without the conditions to foster healthy physical and mental development, children are left exposed to harsh realities that invite extremism.
Refugee camp in Congo. 13 November 2008. (Photo by Julien Harneis)
In chaotic environments, threats to a child's development and security include minimal or uneven access to food and water, violence and its physical and psychological ramifications, displacement caused by violence or natural disaster and limited upward mobility and economic opportunity. Combined, these factors desensitize and normalize the chaotic status quo, making an eventual transition to normalcy far more difficult. Over 180 million children under the age of 5 suffer physical and mental impairments caused by malnutrition and stunted growth. For children also threatened by violence and instability, joining the
armed forces or a militia brings with it the promise of meals, drugs and
protection that satisfy the nutritional and security aspects of their survival.
Many youth embrace the violence, often finding that the option to join the
violence or avoid reintegration is far more practical than putting down their guns. With
distorted incentives, no safety net and survival at stake, children in these crisis
situations end up vulnerable to the centripetal pull of conflict and
instability and the consequences of prolonged crisis.
Although
international agencies like UNICEF make it their goal to alleviate suffering
and shield children from malnutrition, violence and instability, youth in
crisis situations are still at considerable risk. Higher education and job opportunities remain distant fantasies for many kids and adolescents in crises as their environments continue to deteriorate. The children in these chaotic circumstances are far more likely to become the next generations of the poor and disenfranchised, making them a prime audience for recruitment to arms and extremism. The vast majority of them, however, might never experience a secure and nurturing environment. Instead they will depend on international aid agencies and donors for survival and will be lucky if their emotional and physical development isn't impaired. As the current crises in South Sudan, Gaza, Syria, DRC and Mali persist, more and more youths are put at risk and perish at the twin altars of political expediency and insufficient donor contributions. Revamped political will and continued multilateral efforts might be our best shot at remembering that investing in a child's security and development is not just an investment for the present but for future generations as well.
Friday, January 4, 2013
The Global Atlas 2012 Wrap-Up
As 2012 draws to a close and 2013
begins, The Global Atlas reflects on world events over the past year that will
shape the year to come. Some we have written on, others we have not, but the
picture that emerges is that 2012 was a year of gradual transformation as a
result of the cataclysmic events of 2011. It remains to be seen if the changes
wrought in the world will be for better or for worse.
1. Latin
America
Protests in Mexico over the presidential election results
Though Latin America may have appeared in the headlines less than any other
region this year, The US’s southern neighbors have been very active in the
political and economic realms. 2012 saw the rise of Arab Awakening-esque
moments in Mexico
that continue to threaten the government’s already tenuous grasp on stability.
Cuban President Raul Castro, brother of Fidel, has
been signaling that his longtime isolationist Caribbean nation is open to
talks with perpetual enemy America. Meanwhile, two bastions of anti-U.S. power
in the region, Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, are currently
enduring battles with their health that could render them politically unviable
in 2013.
Colombian FARC
rebels declared a unilateral truce, but the Colombian government has yet to do
the same and continues to launch attacks against the rebels, on January 1
claiming at least 13 lives in a single bombing. Talks are ongoing in Cuba, but
the country remains at a deadlock about how to proceed against FARC. Usual
economic darling Brazil saw a disappointing 1 percent rise in GDP, compared to
7.5 percent just two years ago in 2010, largely due to the devaluation of the
real that will help exports in the long run but is currently wreaking havoc
with investment.
Things may be
looking bleak in some countries, but in Chile the economy remained robust
through the financial crisis, growing at an estimated rate of 5.7 percent.
While the nation is still struggling with the aftermath of dictator Augusto
Pinochet, it has the one of the world’s fastest growing economies and has largely
managed to dodge some of the effects of the global recession. Growing middle
classes in almost every country offer new markets for modern goods and
services. Such new markets are essential if the other regions of the world want
to overcome the fiscal and economic mess many find themselves in now. Latin
America may not have solicited the attention it deserved in 2012, but if no
news is good news, then the U.S. should be looking to the south as trading
partners rather than fragile, aid-receiving countries to ignore.
2. Europe
The London Olympics
In Europe, the
Eurozone crisis continued to dominate the headlines, with Greece requiring
another bailout and France and Germany unable to come to a consensus on how to
best remedy the situation. As Colin wrote
earlier this year, a lack of political coordination in concert with economic
integration has led to a breakdown in the entire EU system. Leaders are left
with harsh choices: perpetuate debt and division by continuing on the current
path, or anger domestic populations with strict austerity measures, which may
not even be enough to avoid economic insolvency throughout the region. As the
world’s largest economic entity, a failure in the EU to solve the current
economic and political problems would be even more disastrous than the US
financial crisis of 2009. The longer European countries wait to take action,
the more intractable their problems become, and the more painful a solution will
be.
In Eastern
Europe, Russia had a false start for political reform with protests that began
in 2011 but that fizzled out in time for Vladimir Putin’s reelection to the
presidency in March. Putin himself has noticeably distanced himself further
from the West, most recently signing off on a law that renders all US-Russia
adoptions illegal, seemingly in response to the US Magnitsky Act that bans
human rights violators from visiting the US. In the coming year the challenge
for both parties will be to find enough common ground to come to an agreement
on nuclear weapons, international travel for citizens of both countries, and
the adoption bill. In other
Eastern European countries, corruption, debt, and transparency remained
central obstacles to development.
A bright spot of
news from Europe came in the form of the London
Summer Olympics this year. For a few weeks, the world put confrontations on
hold as countries came together symbolically,
a task they seem to find impossible in reality.
3. Sub-Saharan
Africa
Labor protests in South Africa
From the Sahel
to the Cape of Good Hope, Southern Africa experienced many developments and
setbacks this year. Fighting grew worse in war-torn Democratic Republic of the
Congo, exacerbated by forces allegedly sent by Rwanda and Uganda, a charge that
both countries’ leadership firmly deny. South
Africa experienced violent and tragic labor protests that resulted in at
least 34 deaths when police opened fire on protestors. In a country that has
been touted as an investment opportunity to outsiders, such violent strikes
reveal a need for labor reform unless South Africa’s government wishes to
continue to scare away investors.
Further north, Sudan
and South Sudan came to a few agreements in the process of their protracted
separation. The resumption of oil production and exports was the biggest step
forward for the two nations, although the agreement may be short-lived and
violence is always a possibility. Extreme Islamism also touched the region when
militants took over Northern
Mali in March.
The conflicts in
both the Sudan and South Africa point to another issue facing Africa: the
temporary economic upswing caused by the exploitation of natural resources will
be temporary unless more investment is made in human
security. The current benefits seen by countries with resources to mine and
export will quickly be exhausted unless governments are willing to fund
long-term projects in human and infrastructure
development. Advanced economies cannot take hold in Africa without such
investments, and Africa’s peoples will no longer see the benefits of economic
growth but rather the harsh and sometimes violent repercussions of retraction.
4. The
Middle East and North Africa
Hamas military head Ahmed Jabari, who was assassinated by Israel
The most
tumultuous region in the world was in no danger of losing its title as the
Syrian civil war drew on, Israel and Palestine engaged in another war, US
Ambassador Christopher Stevens was assassinated in Libya, and Egyptian
president Mohammed Morsi
reignited protests. Syria, which we will dedicate a few special articles to in
the future, remains the largest
concern worldwide. Although the Syrian opposition was able to gain
international recognition from important power players including the United States,
the world was unwilling to step in militarily, with efforts at a Security
Council resolution stymied by China and Russia. Even if President Bashar
al-Asad is overthrown, serious questions remain over what a post-Asad Syria
will look like, especially considering the extremists
within the Syrian opposition. The rebellion’s continuation has only led to a
humanitarian disaster and raised chances for regional
war.
Israel received
the most attention from us here at the Global Atlas, whether it was in regards
to the demographic shifts threatening Israel’s domestic
stability or the conflict
with Gaza
that shook an already tenuous period of relative peace. While the facts on the
ground did not change much due to the weeklong conflict,
many viewed it as a staging ground for a larger war yet to come. In the West
Bank, PLO President Abbas succeeded in his bid for UN Non-Member
Observer status, a diplomatic step forward for Palestinian statehood. In
2013 it will remain to be seen if the PLO and Hamas will be able to come
together with Israel to work towards a two-state solution and further the peace
process, or if said process is already too damaged to be resuscitated.
5. Asia
The US was not
alone in 2012 in its “Pivot To Asia.” Central, south, and east Asian countries
saw rising prominence and the region’s two largest economies, India and China,
marched on in their stratospheric economic growth. In East Asia, North
Korea did not shift from its international pariah status as the successor
to Kim Jong Il, his son Kim Jong Un, perpetuated his father’s policies of
isolationism, nuclear provocation, and a failure to revive a stagnant economy.
Meanwhile, Japan, China, and South Korea (as well as Taiwan) engaged each other
in territorial
disputes over several groups of islands, the most famous of which is the
Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute. The arguments over ownership of seemingly inconsequential
rocks reflect the growing tide of nationalism in East Asian nations that
culminated with the election of far-right Japanese PM Abe in December.
Chinese
relations with the US were also strained
as both presidential candidates attempted to look “tough on China” in their
campaigns. Pres. Obama filed complaints with the WTO about China’s trade
policies and Mitt Romney threatened to label China a “currency manipulator” on
his first day in office. He was unsuccessful in his bid for the presidency, but
the current rhetoric paints China as an aggressor rather than the partner it
could be.
In south Asia,
India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan experienced troubles of their own. While India
and Pakistan’s tumultuous relationship appeared relatively peaceful, India has
recently been rocked by protests over the gang rape and murder of a college
students with citizens calling for greater protection of women. Pakistan
experienced its own protests on behalf of one of its female citizens Malala Yousafzai,
a schoolgirl who was shot in the head by the Pakistani Taliban. Malala survived
the attack to become a symbol of Pakistani resistance to extremism. Earlier in
the year, a blasphemy
case revealed the opposite side of the issue with extremists rallying around
the arrest of a young girl accused of desecrating the Qur’an. With US
withdrawal from Afghanistan set for 2014, the coming year will center on preparations
by the country’s different factions as well as its neighbors for the
instability most are sure will follow.
------------
In the coming year, the world faces many problems both large and small. While each country must manage the microcosm of its domestic politics and economy, sweeping issues like the global economy, development, climate change, and political extremism must be dealt with as well. Here's to a 2013 of less violence and turmoil; the world could surely use a year filled with good news after 2012.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)