In the 19 months since the Obama Administration effectively
removed the last of the U.S. troops in Iraq, the embattled state has seen
slight progress – something virtually unparalleled since Saddam Hussein was
taken out of power in 2003. Due to enormous, and previously unforeseen deposits
of oil underneath Kurdish territory in the north and northeast regions of the
country, Iraqi Kurds have had more leverage in dealing and negotiating with
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s Shiite government – in fact, this past June
marked the first time al-Maliki had visited Iraqi Kurdistan in over two years.
On the other hand, sectarian violence, especially between the Sunnis and the
Shiites, has remained incredibly high. For his part, al-Maliki has “encouraged
talks”, but with a promise to continue military assaults against Sunnis he
perceives as threatening, these talks are likely not to happen anytime soon.
However, there certainly remains an air of increasing stability in the country –
an air that has not existed in quite some time.
Yesterday’s simultaneous attack on two jails in Baghdad, of
which al Qaeda has officially claimed responsibility, quickly evaporated that
air and has once again made the world wonder if Iraq is on the brink of
following in Somalia’s footsteps and devolving into a failed state. Insurgents
armed with suicide bombs, car bombs and RPGs took the lives of approximately
120 guards and special op forces, ultimately freeing between 500 and 600
prisoners. Much to everyone’s chagrin, a member of the Iraqi parliament told
Reuters earlier that many of those that escaped were both senior-level al Qaeda
members and had received death sentences following conviction.
Whether or not these prisoners are recaptured and put back
into prison, the question remains: what does this attack mean for the future of
Iraq? For one thing, al Qaeda has flexed their muscles and demonstrated their
capability to wreak havoc on the Iraqi people. It is worth noting that one of
the jails attacked – the infamous Abu Ghraib prison, which gained notoriety for
the abuse U.S. soldiers once inflicted on their prisoners – is one of the most
high-security facilities within Iraq. Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), as this
particular faction of the terrorist organization is known, is estimated to have
members numbering between 2,000 and 3,000, according to an article today in
Time Magazine. With no shortage of mujahideen
ready to continue escalating the violence in Iraq, Iraqi military forces may
need to prepare for a lengthy and bloody campaign.
The serious problem of the AQI is further compounded by the
ongoing conflict in neighboring Syria. The fighting between Sunnis and the
Alawite minority, which includes President Bashar al-Asad, has no end in sight
and is threatening to spill over into Iraq, Turkey, and Jordan. The escalation
of this sectarian conflict could quite possibly be a deathblow to Iraqi’s
stability – with hundreds dying because of sectarian violence in Iraq as it is,
a full-blown civil conflict flooding into Iraq from Syria would likely cause
unprecedented casualties and put an end to the notion that Syria’s conflict can
be defused by the Western world. Furthermore, a civil conflict of that scale
in Iraq would divert the Iraqi military’s attention so far from al Qaeda, that
they would have no trouble growing substantially and to the point of being a
serious threat to not just Iraq, but the entire world. This would be a tragic
resurgence given the time – just about a decade – and resources that the U.S.
invested in ridding Iraq of al Qaeda.
Yes, in the past 19 months since the last U.S. troops left
Iraq things have appeared stabilized and heading in a positive direction
towards a democratic government and less sectarian differences. But, perhaps
that was only a veneer. Yesterday’s attack has pierced that veneer and shown
the world, and particularly the U.S., the condition Iraq has been left in. Iraq
would be foolish to think that NATO, the U.S., or any combination will be
rushing back to their assistance anytime soon – President Obama campaigned the
first time around on pulling troops out of the Middle East, and his
Administration will likely be characterized by his ability to make good on his
promise and facilitate that. But without our assistance, what is the next step
for Iraq? Can the Iraqi military itself overcome the challenges al Qaeda poses?
There is a lot hinging on the Middle East these days – for now, it appears, all
we can do is wait and see who makes the next move.
No comments:
Post a Comment