President Obama’s shift towards surreptitious drone strikes
during his first term exploded into a contentious debate over the past several
months, and finally culminated in a marked shift in U.S. foreign policy today
during a speech given by President Obama at the National Defense University. It
has been nearly twelve years since the World Trade Center attacks, and in that
twelve years the United States has seen two different presidents engage in two
bloody, drawn-out conflicts in the Middle East accompanied by unprecedented
military spending and substantial repercussions across the globe. Former
President George Bush coined the term “The Global War on Terror”, and waged it
tirelessly during his time as president. Now, as President Obama said in his
speech today, it is time that this country rethink its strategy in fighting
terrorism – using Mr. Bush’s rhetoric, it is time the war winds down.
Source: The New York Times
While President Obama is curbing the use of drone strikes
going forward, there is no question they will continue to be a predominant
tactic in the transcendent and pervasive effort to eliminate terrorism from the
world. And while many Americans and others worldwide have obstreperously
protested the use of drones, it’s hard to think of a viable alternative. As the
argument goes, there is no oversight to control the use of drone strikes, and
the result has been countless (literally, often an amount that U.S. officials
neglect to definitively ascertain) civilian casualties. But do we really want
more oversight from the government that is constantly making headlines not for
its milestone legislation and progressive agendas, but rather for its inability
to reign in agreement from opposing sides on even the most banal and
straightforward of issues?
Furthermore, it’s hard to see the logic behind the argument
of civilian casualties. Sure, it is tragic that innocent civilians die due to
drone strikes and quite often there is little or no apology for it. But surely
conventional warfare claims significantly more innocent lives. The issue with
these arguments is that there is rarely an alternative presented, and in the
event that one is presented, it is insufficient in obtaining to goals that the
drone strikes are there to achieve.
“Our systematic effort to dismantle terrorist organizations
must continue,” President Obama said during his speech today. “But this war,
like all wars, must end. That’s what history advises. That’s what our democracy
demands.” In a speech that will be studied in the IR classes of the future,
President Obama has effectively changed the course of this nation’s aggressive
world-policing policy of the past, steering it towards what I think are greener
pastures. Global terrorism is insidious in nature – it will continue to plague
not only the United States, but also the rest of the world. Certain measures,
such as drone strikes, are unavoidable and must be considered a necessary evil
in order to fight for the greater good. I applaud President Obama, however, for
taking a step back and signifying that the days of putting tens of thousands of
troops on the ground in already volatile regions are, at least for now, over.
No comments:
Post a Comment