Mitt
Romney’s comment yesterday that he found preparation for the London Olympics
“disconcerting” was immediately seized upon by English officials and American
opponents to point out his diplomatic shortcomings. Prime Minister David
Cameron even went for the cheap shot, calling Utah “the middle of nowhere,”
which it certainly is, but that’s just rude.
Yet
for once, I’m inclined to side with Mr. Romney (insert expressions of
incredulity here). Compared to China’s 2008 opening ceremonies, this is going
to be a hard contest for the Brits to win. How can you compete with thousands
of drummers beating in unison when all you have is a mere 30 Mary Poppins
actresses and only one 40-foot Voldemort? If Chinese security guards decided to
not show up to work, they would be thrown in a gulag somewhere in Mongolia. But
almost all of the British security guards fail to show up to their assigned
hotel, and it’s simply “oops, you’re fired.”
Fireworks over the Bird's Nest in 2008 (White House photo by Chris Greenberg)
The
Olympics, traditionally a forum for cooperation between nations, have become a
spectator sport even when no athletics are involved. In 2008, when China
unveiled its grandiose, over the top, and absolutely terrifying opening
ceremonies, the world took a good look at the people who were going to run it
some day. These ceremonies aren’t just a showcase for a nation’s culture
anymore; they are a window into the power and money a country can throw behind
what is essentially a meaningless puppet show.
Sure,
it’s adorable that Britain – once the most powerful country on earth and, oh
yeah, America’s overlord – can put together a grassy knoll with cows and sheep
in a huge dome. Unfortunately for them, we already have those, and they’re
called petting zoos. What I think Americans are really hoping for from our
traditional ally in the West, our companion in such forays as Iraq and
Afghanistan, and our lingual brothers and sisters, is a display that shows just
how much the West is still the Best. In this particular case of theatric
diplomacy, we are sure to lose.
Sadly
for the West, a little something called a recession and labor laws will prevent
merry old England from even coming close to the spectacle that was the 2008
opening ceremonies. We are just going to have to make due with the sporting
events themselves. Of course, swimming laps and jumping on balancing beams
isn’t quite as entertaining as watching a 9-year-old lip sync to the voice of
another 9-year-old deemed too ugly to perform, but somehow, I think it might be
good for us. In the absence of an opening ceremony to overtake all of the
actual sports, we might just remember the original intent of the Olympics.
When
Pierre de Coubertin founded the Olympic Committee in 1894, he did so to provide
an arena for athletes to learn the value of competition at the top tiers of the
world. It became one of the only times the great powers of the turbulent 20th
century could come together and cooperate. Instead of jealously eyeing each
other for signs of strength and weakness during the only part of the games that
isn’t a sport, we might just try to revive that sense of collaboration. The
endless posturing by countries such as the US, Iran, Israel, China, Brazil,
etc., seems like it can only end in one place: more war, more violence, and more
death. Yet I think (being the eternal optimist) that if we worked together
diplomatically, we might not have to respond to each other militarily. More
talking and less strutting might just result in a world where it is possible to
agree on more than just the rules of sports.
Or
we could just berate England for failing to do the ceremonies as well as we
would have. Let’s face it, the ceremonies in Chicago would have included a
giant deep dish pizza covered in dollar bills being set aflame with an effigy
of Mao on top. Now that would be a ceremony worth watching.
The important thing in life is not the triumph
but the struggle, the essential thing is not to have conquered but to have
fought well.
-Baron
Pierre de Coubertin
All photos in this article are in the public domain.
No comments:
Post a Comment